9
9
9
9
Nuclear facilities maintain a high level of sensitivity surrounding communication about security arrangements, both externally and internally. Sufficient information is necessary to identify credible threats and effective responses but must be weighed against the need to keep sensitive information confidential.
The nuclear industry has traditionally maintained a culture of secrecy, sharing information only on a ‘need to know basis’. This means that, in the past, information – any information – was rarely shared. Today, the nuclear industry and regulatory bodies of many countries are slowly moving away from this model and towards increased transparency and co-operation – although such arrangements may vary between facilities, industries, and countries.
However, concerns remain. For example, even relatively benign and harmless information, if widely shared, may be misinterpreted by the public and provoke backlash and undue alarm. Consequently, comprehensive reports addressing nuclear security implementation should only be shared under a scheme providing strong assurances of neutrality and information protection. In this context, it is essential to consider the final recipient of information and the appropriate forum in which it is shared.
When sharing is limited to a defined group of trusted parties, states or organisations may feel sufficiently reassured to report more detailed information, including on challenges and issues they have encountered. Conversely, reporting in the public domain can foster transparency and trust with a wider group of stakeholders, but will likely remain limited to the most uncontroversial information.
Further Reading:
